Rem s ReeRIe Om ORD A SNE
Bre Re er ee OT
jas ZN
fhe 7 y
POAPD FOR C ORRECTION OF NAVA! RECORNDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Sulit UN
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JSR
Docket No: NR10591-14
ere TR a Awl - -- AM A
Dear Staff sero gap
i
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States ‘Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Nava
Records, sitting in executive session, consider a your
application on 11 December 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proc eedings of this
Board. Documentary = considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
After careful and conscientious consi
record, the Board found that t ev
e
e
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustic In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB.
Accordingly, your application has been denied The names and
be 11 be furnished upon
ingly,
votes of the members of the panel wi
request
ted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entit- ]
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
evidence within one } 1 F tl rd's decision
~ yx
New evidence is evidence not oreviously
prior to making its decision in this case. In this regard, it
is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00601-03
If your le A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Nava Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2003. approved your separation and on that same day, you were discharged with an entry-level separation by reason of e enlistment due to the diagnosed adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01991-01
materi 1 considered by the Board consisted of your record and applicable statutes, regulations er with all material submitted in support After careful and record, the Board insufficient to es ablish the existence of probable material error or injustice onscientious consideration of the entire ound that the evidence submitted was i You enlisted in th recor age 17. until 5 October been arrested by The On 12 December 194 Naval Personnel o recommended that noted that indivi authority for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10600 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014. Documentary material ed of your application, together support thereof, your naval regulations and policies 7h report of the Headquarters Marine Review Board (PERB), dated 16 After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09283-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 Nove~er 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04183-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 22 November 1988 at age 20. After being advised of your procedural...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01261-08
A three-member panel of the Board for|Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your clients’ application on 24 November 2008. Your client is entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05474-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 October 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR683 14_Redacted
three-member panel of che Board :or Correcc~on of Nava: Records, sitting in executive session, considered your applicacion on 22 January 2015 . warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the seriousness of your misconduct and request for discharge . Further, the Board concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Marine Corps when your request for discharge was granted and should not be permitted to change it now .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02805-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, _. sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3054 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.